When your child needs extra care

The Premature Infant - A Mother’s Perspective

By Lenore Goldfarb IBCLC

Adam 4 hours after birth

I’ve often been asked to say a few words about my experience as a mother of a premature infant. It’s not a short story but it’s worth the read if you want to get an inside view of one parent’s view of the NICU (neonatal intensive care unit).

Our son was born at 32 weeks gestation via gestational surrogacy…my egg…my husband’s sperm…baby carried by another woman. It was an uncomplicated pregnancy until 29 weeks…

My husband and I live in Montreal, Canada. Our son was conceived in a Petri dish (not very romantic but after 8 miscarriages there was no choice) and carried by a gestational surrogate mom in California. Throughout the pregnancy we flew back and forth between Montreal and California for doctors' visits, which included ultrasounds.

It was during one of these visits that we were told that the placenta was low-lying. It was VERY hard to get the OB to say that there was a total placenta previa. He kept hemming and hawing about it, as did another OB. It was hard to tell until week 29, when it was confirmed the hard way. We had come for another ultrasound and the very next day our surrogate went into preterm labor. Lots of blood, lots of labor. Fortunately with medication, she was able to hang on until 32 weeks.

We rented an apartment and prepared for what very well could have been … the worst. We bought a big calendar, pasted it to the refrigerator and each night at midnight we crossed off another day…another day closer to our child’s potential survival.

The whole time our surrogate was in the hospital we were assured that the hospital could handle a premature birth and had a special team available. Actually the team was at another hospital several blocks away.

My husband and I received a call on the morning of Sept. 17, 1999 informing us that we were about to become parents and to get ourselves down to the hospital. This was not a joyous call for us. We started counting on our fingers exactly how many weeks and days it had been and a feeling of dread overcame us.

We got to the hospital within 15 minutes of the call only to be told to sit outside the maternity unit. Turns out our surrogate’s regular OB was at a seminar and his associate, a female OB, had taken over the case. She was not friendly toward surrogacy at all and this was her way of showing it. We were left outside, excluded, as our surrogate underwent a C-section. With placenta previa there was no way that she could deliver vaginally. Only her husband was allowed in. We were very disappointed to miss the birth of our first and so far only child. There would be no birth story, no pictures, and no putting baby to the breast as soon as it was born. But these were small matters at the time. There were lives at stake…our baby’s and our surrogate’s.

So we sat, and we waited, and we waited. Our families waited in Montreal. The surgery was over by 9:17 am but absolutely no one came out to tell us if our son was alive or dead until 1 pm that afternoon. It was agonizing to say the least and when they finally came out to talk to us there was a flurry of activity. Before we could even see him we had to settle all kinds of paper work.

Finally, we were allowed in for a moment. He was being worked on. It had obviously taken a long time to stabilize him. He was on a respirator. His head was being measured and footprints taken. When I asked for a copy there was a whole discussion and finally they gave me one. I took a couple of photographs without flash and my husband took some video and then the doctor in charge asked us to leave so that they could insert lines into the baby’s navel. This is because his tiny hands and arms were too small for intravenous tubes. We had 3 minutes with our son. If I hadn't taken the pictures I wouldn't have remembered those 3 minutes. I think I was in shock.

We were then told that this hospital could not accommodate our son’s special needs since he needed to be on a respirator for more than 6 hours and that he would have to be moved to another hospital with a level III neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We had been misled. Our tiny son now needed to be transported by ambulance. Luckily the team from the other hospital had been called and were already in place when our son was born.

Once our son was safely inside the transport unit, which is a special incubator device equipped with a respirator and pulse oxygen and heart monitor, we insisted that it be wheeled to our surrogate’s room so that she could see that our son, who she so desperately tried to carry to term for us, was ok for the meantime. It was a great source of relief to her. The team left and the doctor told us not to come to the hospital for a couple of hours so that they could set everything up over at the other hospital. We did what we were told.

Adam in the transport incubator 5 hours after birth

We did not feel like parents. We did not feel an instant attachment. We did not feel joy. We were so terrified that our son was going to die that we did not feel anything but fear and grief. Tears ran down my cheeks all day.

We went for a bite to eat. We knew that this was going to be a long day. We had no idea what was in store for us.

Let me backtrack just a bit. When I found out that my surrogate was pregnant I contacted Dr. Jack Newman in Toronto to find out if there was a way for me to be able to breastfeed. He suggested a high dose birth control pill, Ortho 1/35, together with domperidone 20 mg 4 times a day. I started this protocol 7 months before our baby was due. No pumping. No herbs. Just pills. Within 10 days my breasts went from a B cup to a D cup and by day 12 I could express clear drops. Dr. Newman was very happy but cautioned me to leave my breasts alone so that the milk making apparatus could develop.

As soon as our surrogate went into preterm labor I began to pump with a Medela "Pump in Style" double electric breast pump every 3 hours. I pumped and stored breastmilk in 1 oz portions. By the time our son arrived 3 weeks later I was pumping 16 oz per day.

When we arrived at the hospital’s NICU we were met by several people. It was a blur. The doctor told us what to expect, that our son was on a respirator (which we knew) and a lot of things I could not take in at the time due to extreme fear. The social worker was there for emotional support. We were led to our son’s area of the NICU. He looked so tiny and helpless lying there with the respirator tube in his mouth and the umbilical lines. There was another line in his forehead because they needed another vein and his little hands were too tiny to get a vein from there. He was not moving except for his tummy, which kept going up and down with the sound of the respirator. There were a lot of machines. He was lying on an open isolet. He looked like he was going to die.

After we scrubbed up, my husband and I were encouraged to go over to our little boy and touch him. We were worried that touching him would hurt him but the nurse reassured us that it was ok. We each took a hand. His little fingers closed around each of our pinkies. It was a reflex but we felt that he knew we were there. I choked back my tears and began to hum to him and tell him that mommy and daddy were there and that we would never leave him, that he was safe, that we loved him, that we would take care of him. I wished him a Happy Birthday. We stayed all together like that for a very long time until we couldn't stand any longer.

Mommy and Daddy holding Adam’s hands for the first time 8 hours after birth

We stayed with him until midnight and then we went back to our apartment for the night. It would be the last night my husband and I would spend together for several weeks.

Mercifully our son was only on the respirator for 24 hours because he had received steroids in-utero and lung surfactant at birth. Once the respirator was removed and a nasal canula placed instead to deliver supplementary oxygen, they were ready to talk to us about tube feeding.

Everyone knew that our son was born via surrogacy so right away out came the artificial infant milk…I announced to anyone who would listen that I fully intended to breastfeed but everyone naturally assumed that I meant that I was going to breastfeed with the help of a supplementary feeding device…tubes at the breast.

When we spoke initially with the doctor I explained the protocol that I had done and finally ended up lifting up my shirt and squirting breastmilk at him so he would understand (ya gotta do what ya gotta do sometimes). I ended up having to repeat this procedure again and again in order to get the message across that I did indeed have breastmilk and that there was no way my son was getting artificial infant milk. Battle number one, won.

I also called my surrogate and requested collostrum. She was able to express 1/2 oz of collostrum before her doctor ordered a blood transfusion and told her to stop pumping. We mixed the collostrum with a little of my breastmilk and fed this mixture to my son via feeding tube for the next 4 feedings. Then he received my breastmilk alone.

By that afternoon the hospital decided to allow us to hold our son skin to skin. They explained the value of Kangaroo Care to us and my husband and I took shifts holding our son 18 hours per day. Periodically I would bring his tiny head to my breast and express a little milk onto his lips.

Holding my son skin to skin for the first time 24 hours after birth.

On our son’s third day of life his jaundice was so bad and his bilirubin so high that he had to go under the bililights in a covered isolet.

Adam under the bililights 3 days after birth

That evening I gave him his first sponge bath. I started to feel more like a mom and less like my son was going to die any second.

Bathing my son for the first time 3 days after birth

That evening our surrogate and her husband arrived from the other hospital. She was in a wheelchair because she was in no condition to walk around after the C-section. I encouraged her to do Kangaroo Care with Adam and left her and her husband alone with the nurse so they could say goodbye to the pregnancy and Adam properly. Leaving that room was one of the hardest things I’ve ever had to do in my entire life but it was a good thing to do for my surrogate, and for Adam’s sake later in life. I stayed outside until they came to get me about a half-hour later.

My husband and I took our son out from under the bililights every chance we got and did skin-to-skin, Kangaroo Care.

Kangaroo Care Skin to Skin 18 hours a day for 6 weeks and beyond

I tried to put him to my breast everyday. One of the nurses worked diligently with me. On the ninth day he latched! We did two breastfeeds the first day and then alternated between breast and preemie bottle because the hospital insisted that our son was too weak to breastfeed each feeding and we believed them. Luckily, he went back and forth without a problem until I could breastfeed him exclusively. I never used a feeding tube device.

Breastfeeding Adam for the first time 9 days after birth without a supplementary feeding device

Pumping my breastmilk became my most important mission next to holding my son as much as possible. I knew that these were two things that I could do to keep him alive. It kept me going. It gave me hope. I knew that providing breastmilk was more important now than ever. I pumped like crazy. My favourite place to pump was right next to my son’s isolet. I was able to get the most milk that way. There were lots of outlets. I just plugged in, put on the hands free kit and that was that. And my milk supply went up and up. There was a fridge right there in the room if the milk wasn't going to be used right away.

After breastfeeding my son for two weeks with only my own breastmilk the hospital told us that we needed to give our son human milk fortifier because of his prematurity. They decided either to let me breastfeed but to chase the feed with a bottle of fortifier OR to give breastmilk and fortifier mixed 50:50 in a bottle. Then after another couple of weeks they wanted me to give him half preemie artificial infant milk and half breastmilk. I did not know better. I was still afraid that something terrible would happen. And they informed us that unless he gained adequate weight, they could not release him from the hospital. We did not argue. There was no point.

As time went on we got into a routine where my husband would take my breastmilk to the hospital in the morning and stay with my son so that I could get some sleep. I would go at lunchtime and stay until 2 am. We often spent supper together during the shift change and spent the evening as a family. My husband would leave at 11 pm and I would stay until I couldn't keep my eyes open anymore. We held our son the whole time.

The routine was helpful. The nurses patiently showed each of us what to do and how to take care of our baby. They took pictures of him with a Polaroid instant camera so that we could see how he slept while we were at lunch or dinner. They took pictures of us and put them in his isolet on either side of him so he could see us when we weren't there. I often say that this was the best parenting course we could have had. My husband took to this like a duck to water. We started to think about the day our son would come home. We did the CPR course at the hospital twice. We bought a little bassinet and a foam changing pad. We bought little preemie clothes and started to dress him up at the hospital when he wasn't skin to skin with us.

About two weeks into all of this our son finally left the intensive care nursery for the "step-down" area where we had our own room. My husband and I had to leave for an hour twice a day during the staff shift changes. At some point when we were not with our son a nurse who we did not know went into his room and gave him opium. She had mistaken our well-cared-for baby who was in the biggest step down room in the unit…for a drug baby!!! Fortunately she realized her mistake and did a gavage procedure, but still…they only told us a week later. I started to worry that the hospital was going to kill him if the prematurity didn't. It was a terrible fright.

Throughout our stay at the hospital we constantly asked when they thought our son would be going home. They would always say something like "next week" or in a few days when they knew full well that it would be at least a month and maybe 6 weeks. As reasonably intelligent people, my husband and I resented this. My mother kept asking me when she should come and I never knew what to say. I finally told her to come after I was told our son would be released in another week. She came. Our son ended up staying in the hospital 3 more weeks.

This put unnecessary stress on the whole family. After two weeks with no end in sight, my mother left to go back home and be with my dad whom she had left behind. Because of the hospital’s policy of stringing the parents along, I didn't have my mother’s help when my son was finally released from the hospital. It was very difficult for us to plan anything. Our family and friends wanted to welcome our son and celebrate his homecoming but we never knew when we would be going home. The truth would have been much more helpful.

All through the experience I worried that my son would not be normal. I felt terribly guilty that I couldn't carry him myself but reminded myself that the babies I had carried had all died, and so my son was in fact much better off. I mourned the stupid silly things like the baby shower we didn't have, the nursery that wasn't set up yet, being far away from all the family who could come to visit and coo over the baby. Fortunately the community was wonderful. They took us into their hearts. They had us over for dinner and lots of them came to the hospital to coo and fuss over our baby. They brought little stuffed animals and made a big fuss over how cute he was, jaundiced, shaved head, lines sticking out all over. They made us feel like "normal proud parents." We started to see our son through their eyes instead of as a patient to take care of.

Finally the day came for our son to do his "sleep study." This was 10 hours straight monitoring with us out of the room. Our son could come home if he did not have significant apnea episodes. He failed.

The Sleep Study Paraphanalia

A week later the test was repeated and he passed but he would have to come home on a heart apnea monitor just to be safe. A technician came to see us and to explain how it all worked and how to change the leads and where to place them.

Adam during his sleep study

The next day we were discharged. We said tearful goodbyes to everyone and exchanged emails and addresses. We put our baby in his infant car seat. He was so small we needed blankets all around his head to hold it there. I stayed with him in the back seat as my husband drove (crawled) to our apartment at 10 mph with the hazard lights flashing.

We saw a paediatrician one week later and were cleared to fly home. Our surrogate and her family came to say goodbye and to help us load our car with all the things that we had accumulated over the three months that we had been in California. The new friends that we had made during our stay, came to say their goodbyes. We left the next day. Our son pooped on his father and then threw up on him twice during the flight home. The pilot gave us special permission not to turn off the heart apnea monitor, which had a 12-hour battery.

Adam finally leaves the hospital and the infant car seat and head hugger are too big!

We're finally home 7 weeks after Adam’s birthWhen we got to the airport at home, our family was there with a banner that said "Welcome Home Adam" and there were balloons on the front door. They made a big fuss over Adam.

Our son’s official homecoming celebration was a week later. My husband had written a letter one night while sitting next to Adam’s isolet in the NICU. He read this letter at the party. It was a letter to his son, Adam, telling him about his mother and the great lengths she had gone to in order to breastfeed him and give him the best possible start in life. He told Adam how proud he was of me and how one day we would tell him the story of his miraculous birth.

I went on to breastfeed Adam until he was 8 months old and 20 pounds. At my peak I brought in 32 oz per day of my own breastmilk. Today Adam is 2 1/2 years old and he suffers no ill effects from his prematurity. In fact, he’s physically and intellectually advanced.

I’ve never told this story before in such great detail. I hope that by telling it you can glean from it what you can do to help parents who are faced with the arduous task of taking care of a premature child and the emotions that go with it. I think the most important thing to remember is to support the parents in a way that makes them feel like "normal parents."

Fuss and coo over the baby. Encourage the mother to breastfeed and to pump her milk. If they are far from home, offer to have them over for dinner. Take pictures of them to put in the baby’s isolet. Take a picture of the baby for the parents to keep at their home or hotel room. Encourage them to touch their child, do Kangaroo Care. But most important of all, tell them how wonderfully they are taking care of their baby.

Breastfeeding Adam at 4 months, I never used a supplementary feeding deviceBreastfeeding Adam at 4 months, I never used a feeding tube device.

My happy and healthy son, Adam at 22 months
My happy and healthy son, Adam at 22 months


© Lenore Goldfarb, B.Comm, B.Sc, IBCLC, November 2002. All rights reserved.

Kangaroo Mother Care and the Bonding Hypothesis

PEDIATRICS Vol. 102 No. 2 August 1998, p. e17 
Réjean Tessier*, Marta Cristo, Stella Velez, Marta Girón, SW; Zita Figueroa de Calume, Juan G. Ruiz-Paláez, Yves Charpak, and Nathalie Charpak

From the *School of Psychology, Laval University, Québec, Canada; ISS-World Lab, Kangaroo Mother Care Program, Clinica del Nino, Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia; - Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Javeriana University, Santa Fe de Bogotá, Colombia; and EVAL (Institut pour l'Évaluation dans le domaine Médical, Médico-social et de Santé Publique), Paris, France.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND

Based on the general bonding hypothesis, it is suggested that kangaroo mother care (KMC) creates a climate in the family whereby parents become prone to sensitive caregiving. The general hypothesis is that skin-to-skin contact in the KMC group will build up a positive perception in the mothers and a state of readiness to detect and respond to infant’s cues.

METHOD

The randomized controlled trial was conducted on a set of 488 infants weighing <2001 g, with 246 in the KMC group and 242 in the traditional care (TC) group. The design allows precise observation of the timing and duration of mother-infant contact, and takes into account the infant’s health status at birth and the socioeconomic status of the parents.

BONDING ASSESSMENT

Two series of outcomes are assessed as manifestations of a mother’s attachment behavior. The first is the mother’s feelings and perceptions of her premature birth experience, including her sense of competence, feelings of worry and stress, and perception of social support. The second outcome is derived from observations of the mother and child’s responsivity to each other during breastfeeding at 41 weeks of gestational age.

INTERVENTIONS

KMC has three components. The first is the kangaroo position. Once the premature infant has adapted to extrauterine life and is able to breastfeed, he is positioned on the mother’s chest, in an upright position, with direct skin-to-skin contact. The second component is kangaroo nutrition. Although breastfeeding is the prime source of nutrition, infants also may receive preterm formula whenever necessary and vitamin supplements. The third component is the clinical control; infants are monitored on a regular basis, daily until they are gaining at least 20 g per day. Afterward, weekly clinic visits are scheduled until term, which constitutes the ambulatory minimal neonatal care.

In the TC group, infants are kept in incubators until they are able to self-regulate their temperature and are thriving (i.e., have an appropriate weight gain). Infants are discharged according to current hospital practice, usually not before their weight is ~1700 g. Afterward, as with the KMC group, weekly clinic visits are scheduled until term.

RESULTS

We observed a change in the mothers' perception of her child, attributable to the skin-to-skin contact in the kangaroo-carrying position. This effect is related to a subjective "bonding effect" that may be understood readily by the empowering nature of the KMC intervention. Moreover, in stressful situations when the infant has to remain in the hospital longer, mothers practicing KMC feel more competent than do mothers in the TC group. This is what we call a resilience effect. In these stressful situations we also found a negative effect on the feelings of received support of mothers practicing KMC. We interpret this as an isolation effect. To thwart this deleterious effect, we would suggest adding social support as an integral component of KMC.

The observations of the mothers' sensitive behavior did not show a definite bonding effect, but rather a resilience effect. This is attributable to the KMC intervention; mothers practicing KMC were more responsive to an at-risk infant whose development has been threatened by a longer hospital stay. Otherwise, we observed that the mothers (in both the KMC group and the TC group) had behavioral patterns that were adapted to the child’s at-risk health status and to the precarious condition of some premature infants requiring intensive care. We conclude that the infant’s health status may be a more prominent factor in explaining a mother’s more sensitive behavior, which overshadows the kangaroo-carrying effect.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that KMC should be promoted actively and that mothers should be encouraged to use it as soon as possible during the intensive care period up to the 40 weeks of gestational age. Thus, KMC should be viewed as a means of humanizing the process of giving birth in a context of prematurity. This finding confirms the conclusions of the 1996 Trieste workshop suggesting that KMC should be promoted both in hospitals and after early discharge.

KEY WORDS

kangaroo mother care (KMC), bonding, preterm infants, neonatal health care, psychological impact.

ABBREVIATIONS

KMC, kangaroo mother care. LBW, low birth weight. NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.

Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). © ©1998 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

This article has been cited by other articles:

Feldman, R., Eidelman, A. I., Sirota, L., Weller, A. (2002). Comparison of Skin-to-Skin (Kangaroo) and Traditional Care: Parenting Outcomes and Preterm Infant Development. Pediatrics 110: 16-26


Pediatrics (ISSN 0031 4005). © ©1998 by the American Academy of Pediatrics

Comparison of Skin-to-Skin (Kangaroo) and Traditional Care: Parenting Outcomes and Preterm Infant Development

PEDIATRICS Vol. 110 No. 1 July 2002, pp. 16-26 
Ruth Feldman, PhD*, Arthur I. Eidelman, MD, Lea Sirota, MD and Aron Weller, PhD*

*Department of Psychology Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel Department of Neonatology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, and Department of Pediatrics, Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel Schneider Children’s Hospital and Department of Pediatrics, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the kangaroo care (KC) intervention in premature infants affects parent-child interactions and infant development.

METHODS

Seventy-three preterm infants who received KC in the neonatal intensive care unit were matched with 73 control infants who received standard incubator care for birth weight, gestational age (GA), medical severity, and demographics. At 37 weeks' GA, mother-infant interaction, maternal depression, and mother perceptions were examined. At 3 months' corrected age, infant temperament, maternal and paternal sensitivity, and the home environment (with the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment [HOME]) were observed. At 6 months' corrected age, cognitive development was measured with the Bayley-II and mother-infant interaction was filmed. Seven clusters of outcomes were examined at 3 time periods: at 37 weeks' GA, mother-infant interaction and maternal perceptions; at 3-month, HOME mothers, HOME fathers, and infant temperament; at 6 months, cognitive development and mother-infant interaction.

RESULTS

After KC, interactions were more positive at 37 weeks' GA: mothers showed more positive affect, touch, and adaptation to infant cues, and infants showed more alertness and less gaze aversion. Mothers reported less depression and perceived infants as less abnormal. At 3 months, mothers and fathers of KC infants were more sensitive and provided a better home environment. At 6 months, KC mothers were more sensitive and infants scored higher on the Bayley Mental Developmental Index (KC: mean: 96.39; controls: mean: 91.81) and the Psychomotor Developmental Index (KC: mean: 85.47; controls: mean: 80.53).

CONCLUSIONS

KC had a significant positive impact on the infant’s perceptual-cognitive and motor development and on the parenting process. We speculate that KC has both a direct impact on infant development by contributing to neurophysiological organization and an indirect effect by improving parental mood, perceptions, and interactive behavior.

KEY WORDS

Kangaroo Care • parent-infant interaction • maternal depression • fathers • Bayley • infant development

ABBREVIATIONS

KC, kangaroo care • SD, standard deviation • GA, gestational age • NICU, neonatal intensive care unit • CRIB, Clinical Risk Index for Babies • BDI, Beck Depression Index • NPI, Neonate Parental Inventory • HOME, Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment • ICQ, Infant Characteristic Questionnaire • MDI, Mental Developmental Index • PDI, Psychomotor Developmental Index • MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance

Received for publication July 26, 2001; accepted January 9, 2002.

Breastfeeding the Premature Baby

Introduction

Mothers too often have preventable problems with breastfeeding. Many hospital routines make it difficult for mothers and babies to breastfeed successfully. When the baby is born prematurely, mothers have even more difficulty with breastfeeding, and this is unfortunate because premature babies need breastmilk and breastfeeding even more than healthy full term babies. The reason for mothers not getting the help they need is that many of the “techniques” used to save the lives of premature babies were developed during the 1960’s and 1970’s when breastmilk, never mind breastfeeding, really wasn’t a priority in neonatal intensive care units (NICU’s). Unfortunately, despite much about what we have learned since that time about how to help mothers and babies to breastfeed, NICU’s seem to be, in general, with some exceptions of course, resistant to change the way babies should be fed. Even worse, some techniques have been adopted that make the situation even more difficult.

Some Myths About Premature Babies and Breastfeeding

1. Premature babies need to be in incubators

Actually premature babies, even very small ones, often do better skin to skin with the mother (or father) than they do in incubators. Evidence shows that premature babies (and term babies too for that matter) are more stable metabolically when they are skin to skin with the mother. Their breathing may be more stable and less distressed, their blood pressures are more normal, they maintain their blood sugars better and their skin temperatures better in Kangaroo Mother Care (skin to skin care for most of the day) than they do in incubators. Furthermore, mothers and babies in Kangaroo Mother Care will more likely produce more milk, she will get the baby to the breast earlier and the baby will breastfeed better. A document from the WHO discusses this at length with many references. Please show this document to your baby’s doctor(s). You can get it at the website www.who.int free of charge.

2. Premature babies all need fortifiers

Actually, most don’t. If the mother is expressing enough milk, babies over about 1500 grams (usually about 32 weeks gestation babies weigh this much, though there are exceptions) can grow just fine with breastmilk only, perhaps with the addition of vitamin D or phosphorus, maybe.

The real problem behind this “need” for fortifiers is that it has become a gospel, carved in stone, for many NICU policies that babies must grow at the same rate outside the mother as they would have had they not been born so early. But there is no good evidence to prove that, whereas there is evidence that babies who grow faster than the premature baby on breastmilk has problems later in life with higher levels of “bad” cholesterol, higher blood pressure, insulin resistance (which may be an early finding of type 2 diabetes) and overweight. These studies were done in premature babies given a) just breastmilk b) breastmilk plus banked breastmilk or c) breastmilk plus preterm formula. The babies who got the preterm formula did grow faster and bigger but there was a price.

How can the baby be fed without using fortifiers?

Well, first of all, some babies will need fortifiers, true: really tiny babies and babies whose mothers are not able to express enough milk. However, fortifiers are now being made from human milk (breastmilk) but admittedly they are not easily available yet and are very expensive as well. There is no reason fortifiers need be made from cow’s milk. However, most premature babies don’t need fortifiers because most premature babies are “big” premature babies.

  • Many NICU’s have a rule that babies can receive only a certain amount of liquid a day. This is usually kept at about 150 to 180 ml/kg/day, sometimes less. If the baby also has an intravenous, the fluid given orally is cut down even more. This restriction of fluid makes sense, for example, if the baby is on a ventilator to help him breathe because too much fluid may cause him to go into heart failure and prevent his coming off the ventilator. So, restriction of fluid, plus the “baby must grow as if he were still in the uterus” results in the “need” for fortifier.

    One way avoiding the need for fortifiers in some premature babies, I learned when I worked with premature babies in Africa, was to give them more breastmilk than what is ‘allowed’ in NICU’s. True, these babies were not like babies in NICU’s in affluent countries; they were bigger, not as sick and needed not more than a little oxygen to survive. But, as a believer at that time in “the baby must grow as if he were still inside the mother”, I increased the amounts of milk the baby received well above the 150 to 180 ml/kg/day, sometimes up to 300 ml/kg/day and the babies did fine and grew well. So as not to give the baby too much milk at one time, the milk was dripped into the baby’s stomach continuously, a few drops at a time.

  • There may be a need for additions to the breastmilk, depending on the baby’s levels in the blood. It is possible to add vitamin D, phosphorus, calcium, even human protein (albumin) and human milk fat (from a breastmilk bank) to the baby’s milk without using fortifiers. If the baby doesn’t need fortifiers, then fortifiers actually should be considered diluters since they decrease the concentration of all those elements that make breastmilk special and unique.

 

3. Premature babies cannot go to the breast until they are at 34 weeks gestation

This is simply not true. Work in NICU’s friendly to breastfeeding, especially in Sweden, have shown that babies can start taking the breast even by 28 weeks gestation and many are able to latch on and drink milk from the breast by 30 weeks gestation. Indeed, some babies have gotten to full breastfeeding by 32 weeks gestation. This means breastfeeding, not receiving breastmilk in a bottle or tube in the stomach. With Kangaroo Mother Care and early access to the breast, it can be done elsewhere as well.

Of course, every baby is different and some babies may take longer depending on whether they were sick with respiratory problems or other issues, but waiting until the baby is 34 weeks gestation before trying the baby on the breast is using the bottle-fed baby as the model for infant feeding.

See the following articles or refer your doctor to them:

  • Nyqvist K. The development of preterm infants’ breastfeeding behavior. Early Human Development; 1999;55:247–264
  • Nyqvist K. Early attainment of breastfeeding competence in very preterm infants, Acta Pædiatrica 2008;97:776–781

4. Mothers of premature babies need to use nipple shields to get their babies latched on well and getting milk well

This is certainly not true most of the time from my experience in Africa (actually, we never used nipple shields in Africa) and the experience of the NICU’s in other countries such as Sweden. The second article by Nyqvist had babies born as small as 26 weeks gestation and up to 31 weeks gestation and only a small minority ever used a nipple shield. Yet, unlike what happens generally in North American NICU’s from which very few babies leave the hospital breastfeeding (at best they are getting breastmilk in the bottle and frequently the mother is not putting the baby to the breast), almost all the babies actually left the hospital breastfeeding.

The key is to take time to get the baby to take the breast well. This does take extra time compared to using a nipple shield with the mother, but in the long run the result is worth it. Nipple shields eventually lead to a decrease in the milk supply which makes getting off the nipple shield very difficult (see the information sheet The Baby Who Does Not Yet Latch On).

The way to get the premature baby latched on is not essentially different from the baby who was born at term. See the information sheet When Latching and the video clips at the website ibconline.ca. These video clips do not show premature babies but the principles of a good latch are the same.

5. Premature babies need to learn to take a bottle which teaches them how to suck

Well, I don’t know what to say about this. It’s just not true. Premature babies can learn to suck without getting bottles as shown, once again, from experience elsewhere in the world. Too often, mothers and babies are hurried out of hospital with the “advice” that the baby will be discharged earlier if he starts taking a bottle. This is not a way to help the mother and baby. In any case it would not be true that the baby needs a bottle to learn. Kangaroo Mother Care and getting the baby to the breast before the “magic” 34 weeks gestation would do a lot to avoid this situation. Furthermore, as different muscles are used when bottle-feeding vs. breastfeeding, bottle-feeding ‘teaches’ baby poor sucking skills and these can sometimes be extremely difficult to ‘unteach’.

6. Premature babies get tired at the breast

This is believed to be true because babies, not only premature babies, tend to fall asleep at the breast when the flow of milk is slow especially in the first few weeks. The baby is given a bottle and because the flow of milk is rapid, the baby wakes up and sucks forcefully. The false conclusion? The baby tired out at the breast because it’s hard work and the bottle is easier.

Premature babies often do not latch on well, partly because we teach latching on so poorly. With a good latch, the use of breast information sheet Breast compression and, if necessary, using a lactation aid at the breast to supplement if necessary, the baby will get good flow and not fall asleep at the breast. Get that flow increased and you will see that breastfeeding is neither difficult for the baby nor tiring for him.

7. Test weighing (weighing the baby before and after a feeding) is a good way of knowing how much milk the baby got at a feeding

Test weighing presupposes that we know what a breastfed baby is supposed to get. How can we know since the rules that say a baby of this weight and this age should get x amount of milk are based on babies fed formula by bottle? And how can we say how much the baby would have gotten if he had been well latched on, with the mother using information sheet Breast compression, especially if the breastfeeding is limited to a particular time or schedule like 10 or 20 minutes (because of the concern that the baby will tire out)?

The best way to know if a baby is getting milk well from the breast is to watch the baby at the breast. See the video clips at the website ibconline.ca.

8. Premature babies need to continue getting fortifiers once they leave hospital

This is a relative new wrinkle in the undermining of breastfeeding the premature baby. Perhaps someone presented a paper at a conference that showed the baby gained better if the fortifiers were continued even after his discharge from hospital. But, again, more is not necessarily better and breastfeeding is more important than more weight gain, which is not necessarily good. See the information on fortifiers above.

Premature babies and their mothers run into breastfeeding problems much more frequently than do babies born at term. But these can be fixed. Get good hands on help as soon as possible. See also the following information sheets:


Written by Jack Newman MD, FRCPC, IBCLC and Edith Kernerman, IBCLC, 2009©

This handout may be copied and distributed without further permission, on the condition that it is not used in any context in which the WHO code on the marketing of breastmilk substitutes is violated.